It was 8pm on a Friday in November. The hotel’s guest WiFi \u2014 which had been intermittent since mid-afternoon \u2014 finally went down completely. The front desk manager called the internet service provider. The ISP ran a line check, found no issues on their end, and suggested the problem was the router. The router vendor’s support line connected to an overseas call center that asked for a model number nobody could locate. Three hours passed. By 11pm, a manager with a personal hotspot was walking guests through tethering their devices.<\/p>\n
The WiFi was restored Saturday morning, when someone found the right contact in an email thread from 14 months earlier.<\/p>\n
This is vendor management failure. Not a dramatic failure \u2014 a slow, grinding, expensive one that plays out in hospitality and property management businesses across Chicago every week.<\/p>\n
A mid-sized Chicago hotel or property management firm typically manages technology relationships with: a property management system (PMS) vendor, an online booking platform, a payment processor, a guest WiFi provider, an internet service provider, a phone system vendor, a security camera system, a building access control system, a point-of-sale system for food and beverage, and \u2014 increasingly \u2014 HVAC and energy management integrations.<\/p>\n
Each of these is a separate contract. Each has a separate support line. Each has a separate SLA, renewal date, and escalation path. Each was likely selected by a different person at a different time, with no systematic evaluation of how they would work together.<\/p>\n
Nobody is coordinating them. When two of them interact and something breaks, the resulting support conversation is a version of the WiFi story above \u2014 each vendor pointing at the other while the problem persists and guests complain.<\/p>\n
The direct costs are the ones you can see: the Friday night overtime, the comp’d rooms, the hours spent on hold with support lines. These are real and measurable.<\/p>\n
The indirect costs are harder to quantify but larger in aggregate. Staff time spent managing vendor relationships and chasing support tickets is staff time not spent on guests or tenants. Overlapping or auto-renewed contracts that nobody reviewed represent budget waste that accumulates quietly. Vendor software that hasn’t been patched because nobody managed the update cycle creates security vulnerabilities that compound over time.<\/p>\n
And then there is the guest experience cost \u2014 which, in hospitality, is the most consequential cost of all. Technology failures are visible. They create reviews. They create word-of-mouth. They create the impression that the property is not being professionally managed.<\/p>\n
No single point of accountability.<\/p>\n
In most hospitality and property management businesses we work with, vendor relationships are distributed across the front office manager, the general manager, the IT person (if there is one), and whoever set up the original system. When something goes wrong, the question ‘who handles this?’ takes time to answer \u2014 time that compounds the problem.<\/p>\n
Contracts that auto-renewed without review.<\/p>\n
We regularly find contracts for services no longer in active use, at pricing that was competitive three years ago but isn’t anymore, for systems that have been superseded but are still technically running. Auto-renewal is a vendor’s best friend and an operator’s quiet cost leak.<\/p>\n
Security gaps from unpatched vendor integrations.<\/p>\n
Every system that integrates with another \u2014 the booking platform that connects to the PMS, the PMS that connects to the payment processor \u2014 is a potential security vector. When integrations run on outdated software because the vendor hasn’t pushed an update and nobody internally is managing the patch cycle, the exposure grows with every passing month.<\/p>\n
What managed vendor coordination looks like<\/p>\n
At CMIT Chicago, we serve as the single point of contact for all of a client’s technology vendors. In practice, that means:<\/p>\n
The result: your staff focuses on guests, not tickets<\/p>\n
The goal of vendor management isn’t technology for its own sake. It’s operational stability that lets your team do their actual job \u2014 which, in hospitality and property management, is delivering an experience to guests and tenants.<\/p>\n
Technology should be invisible. When it’s managed well, it is. When it isn’t, it becomes the thing your front desk manager is thinking about at 8pm on a Friday instead of your guests.<\/p>\n
CMIT Chicago has managed technology vendor relationships for Chicago hospitality and property management businesses since 2008. If your current vendor environment is costing you more time than it should, let’s talk.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Friday night. Guest WiFi is down. Nobody knows who to call. It…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1076,"featured_media":831,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[118,117],"class_list":["post-830","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-managed-it-services","tag-hospitality-it-solutions","tag-managed-technology-services"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t